Preparing Frog Microbiome for Future Exposure to Deadly Chytrid Fungus through Vaccine
June 11, 2023
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
- fact-checked
- peer-reviewed publication
- trusted source
- proofread
by Pennsylvania State University
A host organism's microbiome, consisting of often beneficial microorganisms including bacteria and fungi that live on or within the host, can play a crucial role in the overall immune response of humans and animals. However, it remains unclear how vaccines against harmful pathogens impact the microbiome. A recent study conducted by researchers at Penn State found that a new vaccine against the deadly chytrid fungus in frogs can shift the microbiome's composition, making frogs more resilient to future exposure to the fungus.
The study, which was published on June 12 in a special issue of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, suggests that the microbiome response could be an important, overlooked aspect of vaccine efficacy.
"The microorganisms that make up an animal's microbiome can often help defend against pathogens, for example by producing beneficial substances or by competing against the pathogens for space or nutrients," said Gui Becker, associate professor of biology at Penn State and leader of the research team. "But what happens to your microbiome when you get a vaccine, like a COVID vaccine, a flu shot, or a live-attenuated vaccine like the yellow fever vaccine? In this study, we used frogs as a model system to start exploring this question."
The chytrid fungus threatens frogs and other amphibians, resulting in the extinction of some species and severe population declines in hundreds of others across several continents. In susceptible species, the fungus causes a sometimes-lethal skin disease.
"Chytrid is one of the worst, if not the worst, pathogen for wildlife conservation in recent history, and there is a critical need to develop tools to control its spread," said Becker, who is also a member of the One Health Microbiome Center and the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics at Penn State. "We found that, in some cases, vaccines can induce a protective shift in the microbiome, which suggests that carefully manipulating the microbiome could be used as part of a broader strategy to help amphibians, and perhaps other vertebrates, deal with emerging pathogens."
The researchers applied a non-lethal dosage of a metabolic product created by the chytrid fungus to tadpoles as a vaccine. After five weeks, they observed how the composition of the microbiome had changed, identifying individual species of bacteria and their relative proportions. The researchers also cultured each species of bacteria in the lab and tested whether bacteria-specific products facilitated, inhibited, or had no effect on chytrid growth. They then added the results to and compared them with a large database of this information.
"Increasing the concentration and duration of exposure to the chytrid product prophylaxis significantly shifted the composition of the microbiome so that there was a higher proportion of bacteria producing anti-chytrid substances," said Samantha Siomko, a master's student in the Becker Lab at the University of Alabama at the time of the research and first author of the paper. "This protective shift suggests that if an animal were exposed to the same fungus again, its microbiome would be better capable of fighting the pathogen."
Prior attempts to induce a protective change in the microbiome relied on adding one or multiple species of bacteria known to create potent antifungal metabolites (i.e. probiotics). However, the researchers claim that this method can be challenging because the added bacteria must compete with other species in the microbiome and is not always successful at establishing itself as a permanent member of the microbiome.
"These frogs have hundreds of bacterial species on their skin that they pick up from their environment, and the composition changes regularly, including with the season," said Becker. "Attempting to manipulate the community, for example by adding a bacterial probiotic, is challenging because the dynamics in the community are so complex and unpredictable. Our results are promising because we have essentially manipulated the entire bacterial community in a direction that is more effective against fighting the fungal pathogen without adding a living thing that needs to compete for resources to survive."
Notably, the overall number of species—the diversity—within the microbiome was not impacted, only the composition and relative proportions of species. The researchers believe this is positive, as declines in the diversity of the frog microbiome can often lead to illness or death, and it is generally accepted that maintaining a diverse microbiome allows the community of bacteria and microbe species to respond to threats more dynamically and with higher functional redundancy.
The researchers suggest that this adaptive shift in the microbiome composition, which they call the 'microbiome memory,' could play an important role in vaccine efficacy. In addition to understanding the mechanisms behind the shift, the research team hopes to study the idea of microbiome memory in adult frogs as well as other vertebrate species in the future.
'Our collaborative team implemented a prophylaxis technique that relied on metabolic product derived from the chytrid fungus,' said Becker. 'It's possible that vaccines based on mRNA or live cells—like those often used to protect against bacterial or viral infections—may differently affect the microbiome, and we are excited to explore this possibility.'
In addition to Becker and Siomko, the research team includes Teagan McMahon—who developed the prophylaxis method—at the University of Connecticut; Sasha Greenspan, Wesley Neely, and Stanislava Chtarbanova at the University of Alabama; Douglas Woodhams at the University of Massachusetts; and K. M. Barnett at Emory University.
Journal information: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Provided by Pennsylvania State University